HYBRID EVENT: You can participate in person at Madrid, Spain or Virtually from your home or work.

2nd Edition of Global Conference on

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

September 09-11, 2024 | Madrid, Spain

GCPR 2024

Anatomy, biomechanics, trigonometry & psychology of prosthetic hip instability

Speaker at Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024 - Subramanya Adiga
Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand
Title : Anatomy, biomechanics, trigonometry & psychology of prosthetic hip instability

Abstract:

In contrast to native hip dislocations (NHD), prosthetic hip dislocations (PHD) can be multi-directional & recurrent, often following minimal trauma or occurring spontaneously.  Also, PHD prevention advice following anterior approaches (to avoid flexion, adduction & internal rotation) is counter-intuitive, being opposite of the advice following anterior NHD. Known causes for PHD (versus NHD) include shallower acetabular cup, smaller femoral head, unrepaired or excised anterior capsule and partial abductor paralysis.

There are other less-known factors though. Firstly, anterior approaches disrupt the posterior capsule as it attaches half-way along the femoral neck, resulting in a posterior capsular defect. Still, the postero-superior myo-capsular tether (ischeo-femoral ligament, adjacent small muscles), is intact, opposing posterior or supero-lateral PHD tendency. If this is sacrificed for the ease of femoral reaming, femur becomes hyper-mobile multi-directionally, predisposing for PHD over a wide arc supero-laterally & posteriorly.

Also, femur & acetabulum are both anteverted naturally, allowing a good range of flexion & external rotation. By inadequately reproducing anteversion of these components in anterior approaches, (because of anterior PHD concerns), the propensity towards posterior PHD increases. Attempts towards neutral position implantation often results in slight retroversion of components, further increasing the posterior PHD tendency on flexion &/or internal rotation.
These factors – anatomy of the posterior capsule, version issues, approach choice logistics and surgeon’s psychology – are not well-understood and appreciated; if these re well-publicised, then surgeons are likely to take appropriate preventive steps such as using the posterior approach where possible, preserving the postero-superior tether (if using anterior approaches) and implanting components in adequate anteversion.

Keywords: ‘Anteversion’, ‘posterior capsule’, ‘prosthetic hip dislocation’, ‘anterolateral approach’, ‘acetabular cup’, ‘femoral stem

Biography:

Dr. Adiga studied Medicine at Karnatak University, graduated with MBBS in 1987. He further trained in Orthopaedics in India, obtained FRCS Ed diploma from Edinburgh and trained for CCT in Rehab medicine in UK. He obtained further qualifications of FAFRM & FASLM after arriving to New Zealand. He practices neuro-rehabilitation in Auckland and is expert in spasticity & pain interventions. His special interests include Lifestyle medicine, stroke & spinal injuries rehab, application of orthopaedic & PN pathology principles in day-to-day rehab processes.

Watsapp